Skip to main content

Scale brands without blending them

Identity, creative, staff access and compliance thresholds stay separate brand by brand. The platform underneath them stays a single codebase.

Four tenant brand cards fanned out, each with a demo chip, a circular brand mark and a row of readiness dots for payments, games, verification and domain, with a colour palette panel behind them.

What separation actually buys a group

The efficiency of a shared foundation, with the boundaries a serious operator expects.

  • Faster brand provisioning

    A new brand is a new deployment, created and configured without rebuilding the platform around it.

  • Granular staff access

    Each team and role sees only what its job needs, brand by brand rather than across the whole group.

  • Brand-level configuration

    Branding, content, languages and compliance thresholds are set per brand and per market.

  • Data isolation

    Player records and credentials stay inside the brand that holds them.

Staff access is scoped brand by brand, not across the group

A team member is invited into the brand they work on and given a role that grants only what that job needs. Nobody inherits a view of a brand they do not run.

  • Invited per brand, scoped per role

    A payments reviewer on one brand is not a payments reviewer on all of them.

  • Permissions down to the individual action

    The same control that applies inside a brand applies between brands.

  • Every permission change is audited

    The record shows who could have done what, on which brand, and from when.

A crop of the back office settings navigation showing Brand Studio, Localization and Team Members, with Team Members selected.

What each brand carries of its own

Its own login and account system

Player credentials and accounts belong to the brand that holds them, by construction rather than by setting. A player on one brand is not a player on another unless they choose to be.

The logo and images panel of Brand Studio with three empty upload slots for the site header logo, the browser tab favicon and the sign-in background.

Its own creative library

Images, banners and brand assets sit in a private media space that no other brand in the group can reach.

Its own compliance thresholds

Tier thresholds are configured per brand, so a market with strict affordability expectations does not inherit the settings of one without.

Its own back office

One portal per brand rather than a single console with a brand switcher, which is what keeps the separation real rather than cosmetic.

Brand Studio captures come from the demo tenants MaxBet and LuckyOni.

What is separate, and what is shared

Separate per brand

Held by the brand

Player accounts and credentialsWhether an account on one brand is an account on another.
Included
Creative library and brand assets
Included
Staff roles and permissions
Included
Compliance tier thresholds
Included
Back-office portal
Included
Domains and branding
Included
Platform codebaseOur own brands and every sold copy run identical software.
Not included
Product updates and fixes
Not included

Shared across the group

Held by the platform

Player accounts and credentialsWhether an account on one brand is an account on another.
Not included
Creative library and brand assets
Not included
Staff roles and permissions
Not included
Compliance tier thresholds
Not included
Back-office portal
Not included
Domains and branding
Not included
Platform codebaseOur own brands and every sold copy run identical software.
Included
Product updates and fixes
Included

Each brand is a full deployment, so it carries its own setup and its own monthly fee. The commercials for a portfolio are scoped in discovery rather than published as a price list.

Questions groups ask

Separated. Every brand runs its own login and account system, so a player on one brand is not a player on another unless they choose to be, even inside a single group. Credentials are walled off, and a compromise on the smallest brand does not become an incident on the largest.

This is an architectural choice rather than a setting, and it is what makes a brand separately auditable, separately reportable and separately sellable later.

That is one of the reasons brands are genuinely separated. A brand carries its own player accounts, its own creative library, its own back office and its own audit history, so it can be treated as a discrete asset rather than a slice of a shared database that has to be untangled first.

The commercial and regulatory work of a sale is still real, including the licence position and the player communications. The platform is not the part that blocks it.

Yes. Each brand is a full deployment with its own player database, its own identity system and its own back office, so it carries its own setup and its own monthly fee.

The cost calculator lets you model several brands together, and the revenue share applies to the revenue each brand produces. If you are planning a portfolio rather than a single launch, describe its shape in discovery, because the commercials for a group are a conversation and not a price list.

What this page covers in the feature matrix

Each capability below is a row in the platform index, where its tier sits beside the method and the date behind it. Read the full feature matrix.

Identity isolation per brand

Every brand runs its own separated login and account system. Player credentials are walled off between brands, even inside a single operator group.

Private media space

Every brand has its own creative library: images, banners and brand assets uploaded by drag and drop, and private to that brand alone.

Book a group walkthrough against your own brand structure

Bring the shape of the portfolio you actually run, and we will show the separation on the running platform.

We reply within one working day.