Where SOFTSWISS is genuinely stronger, where we are different, and how the two commercial models compare.
How this comparison was made
Everything this page says about SOFTSWISS comes from material SOFTSWISS publishes about itself, read on the date below. Where we could not find an answer we say so rather than guess. This is Scalara's own reading, not a third party benchmark, and we publish no scores. SOFTSWISS is a trademark of its owner, used here only to name the product you are comparing us against.
Comparing Scalara Platform with SOFTSWISS. Sources last checked on 6 September 2026. We publish no scores and no ranking.
This is the honest half of the page and it comes first, because a comparison that hides it is worth nothing to you. Four of these would make us recommend them over ourselves.
A substantially broader aggregated and proprietary game catalogue than ours, and a sportsbook offered today, where ours is in active development.
A long standing, publicly marketed crypto casino offering running on infrastructure they operate at scale, with years of production behind it.
A far longer operating history and many more live casinos than we have. If the number of brands already running is your first filter, they win it.
A much larger compliance, support and partner organisation, and broader jurisdictional experience than a provider of our age can claim.
Not better across the board. Different in four specific places, each of which you can check on this site rather than take on trust.
On the Turnkey route a licensed operator receives a complete private copy of the platform, on their own infrastructure, holding their own data and their own player accounts. Not a brand configured inside someone else's environment.
The wallet checks a player's compliance standing before any balance changes, and the decision, its tier and the policy behind it are recorded on the player record.
Setup, monthly fee and the revenue share bands are published on our pricing page, with a calculator you can run before you speak to anybody.
Harm and fraud are designed to be settled before commercial optimisation, on the same record. This orchestration layer is in active development and is described as design intent, not as behaviour available today.
Screenshots are captures of the demo tenants MaxBet and LuckyOni. Every figure on screen is demo data.
Read the right hand column as what we found published, on the date under the table. Where a cell says we could not find something, that is a statement about our search and not about their product.
Published on this site
From their own public material
Statements about SOFTSWISS come from their own published material, read on the date recorded with this comparison. We publish no scores and make no claim about their pricing, uptime or customer numbers. We publish our indicative setup fee, monthly fee and revenue share. Most providers quote on request.
A migration is a scoping exercise before it is a technical one. This is the sequence, and we will tell you at step two if it does not make sense.
Provisioning takes hours. Getting to a live, trading casino also depends on licence approval, payment onboarding and content agreements, which we sequence with you.
Your current platform, player and wallet records, live providers, brands and regulatory obligations, written down before anything is agreed.
What moves, what has to be rebuilt, what is left behind, and what your players will notice on the day it happens.
The migration is run into a prepared environment first, with balances and verification states reconciled against your existing records.
The switch happens against an agreed plan, with the audit trail recording every step for your regulator and for you.
In most cases yes, and the assessment comes first. What matters is what your current provider will export, in what format, and what your contract permits.
Player identities, balances, bonus states, verification history and transaction records each need a defined destination on the platform, and some of them need decisions from you about how history is represented. We would rather tell you early that something cannot move cleanly than discover it during a cutover weekend.
Balances migrate as balances, with real, bonus and locked amounts kept apart rather than merged into one figure, because merging them destroys the terms attached to the bonus part.
Active bonuses need a decision from you: carry the remaining wagering requirement across, settle it before the move, or honour it manually. Each option has a player communication attached. We plan that before the cutover, and the ledger records the migration itself so the opening position is auditable.
Not automatically, but it depends on what you can bring with you. If your existing verification records can be exported with enough evidence attached, they can be represented in the player's compliance tier on the platform.
Where the evidence is thin or the format cannot be reconciled, the honest answer is that some players will need to be verified again. It is better to know which ones before the move than to find out at their first withdrawal.
On a dedicated deployment, completely. A private platform copy is your own environment holding your infrastructure, your data, your player accounts and your branding, and there is nothing shared for another customer to reach.
On shared deployments, brands are separated at the identity and account level, so credentials and player records do not cross between them. If data residency or isolation has a specific meaning for your licence, raise it in discovery, because it shapes where your deployment sits.
Send us the shape of your current operation and we will come back with what moving would involve, including the parts that would be difficult.
We reply within one working day.
